The narrator tries to maintain the idea of two worlds that completely contradict each other it is a vital part of her strategy to make Omelas an understandable and imaginable reality. This paradox being that the source of their happiness is what causes them to be upset.
However, there is evidence that the people experience guilt when mention of the suffering child arises in the narrative, “Often the young people go home in tears, or in a tearless rage, when they have seen the child and faced this terrible paradox.” (Le Guin 7). In doing this, she constructs a world of happiness and a world of suffering …show more content… It is appropriate that the narrator mentions the idea of ‘no guilt’ in the text, “One thing I know there is none of in Omelas is guilt.” (Le Guin 6). the narrator provides many versions of Omelas when she changes details about the city, however, these types of worlds seem to fall into two opposing worlds based on the concept of good versus evil. In Ursula Le Guin’s The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, the narrator struggles with the problem of creating a realistic ‘perfect world’, and as a solution she has created two contradictory worlds in which the existence of one is dependant on the other. However, if a perfect world contains suffering, it then becomes flawed.
Show More The idea of a perfect world is very complex and often confusing to understand it becomes simpler to imagine such world if suffering existed within it.